Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Plantarflexion Resistance of Selected Ankle-Foot Orthosis: A Pilot Study of Commonly Prescribed Prefabricated and Custom-Molded Alternatives

By DeToro, William W.; JPO - Journal of Prosthetics & Orthotics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 39-44
Publication Date: June 2001

Study documents the resistance to plantarflexion of a variety of commonly prescribed ankle-foot orthoses (AFO). A healthy 59-year-old man, 6 feet 3 inches tall and weighing 245 pounds, was recruited as a volunteer participant. A negative impression was taken of his right lower leg by using fiberglass casting tape wrapped over a single layer of cotton stockinet. The negative impression was filled with plaster to create a positive model. The model was used to fabricate eight different custom-made AFOs of varying biomechanical designs. Ten prefabricated ankle-foot AFOs were also fitted to the model. All of the orthotic designs are displayed in table format. The results demonstrated that commonly prescribed AFOs can be grouped according to the maximum static resistance provided when the orthosis is deflected to ten degrees of plantarflexion.
Published by: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins   (Website:http://www.lww.com)
American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists    (Web Site: http://www.oandp.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.