Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Applicability, Validity, and Reliability of the Piper Fatigue Scale in Postpolio Patients

By Strohschein, Fay J.; Kelly, Carl C.; Clark, Anita C., PT; Westbury, Chris F., PhD; Shuaih, Ashfaq, MD; Chan, K. Ming, MD; American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 122-129
Publication Date: February 2003

Study evaluates the validity and reliability of the Piper Fatigue Scale, which is potentially applicable for measuring fatigue in people who have been diagnosed with polio. The Piper Fatigue Scale was designed to measure fatigue in people with cancer, and includes 22 characteristics of fatigue in four different dimensions: (1) behavioral/severity, (2) affective meaning, (3) sensory, and (4) cognitive/mood. The study consisted of interview surveys with 64 people with postpolio syndrome and 25 healthy controls. The sample was recruited from a postpolio support group, a postpolio clinic, and the general community. The participants completed the Piper Fatigue Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire during the interview. Face and content validity of the Piper Fatigue Scale was established by a team of experts and by a group of people who had recovered from polio. Results indicated that the Piper Fatigue scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring postpolio fatigue.
Published by: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins   (Website:http://www.lww.com)

Association of Academic Physiatrists    (Web Site: http://physiatry.org )
This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number J45233

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.