Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Wheelchair and Occupant Kinematics During "Low-G" Turning and Braking

By van Roosmalen, Linda, PhD; Bertocci, Gina E., PhD; Herring, Donald, IDSA; RESNA 26th International Annual Conference 2003,
Publication Date: 2003

Study conducted to investigate the dynamic response of a less than optimally secured wheelchair and occupant when exposed to emergency driving maneuvers associated with large transit vehicles. The study utilized Dynaman wheelchair and occupant computer simulation software to investigate frontal impact scenarios at 30 miles per hour. Three wheelchair restraint scenarios were investigated: (1) four-point tiedown and no occupant restraint, (2) two-point tiedown and no occupant restraint, and (3) two-point tiedown and pelvic restraint. Preliminary findings suggest that unsecured forward-facing wheelchairs and unbelted occupants may not be safe even in non-crash conditions. The addition of a pelvic restraint improved the overall dynamic response of the occupant during braking and turning. These findings support the anecdotal reports of wheelchair accidents that have occurred during normal or emergency driving. Implications for further research are discussed.
Published by: Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA)   (Website:http://www.resna.org)

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.