Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Overview of Legal Issues in Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement

By Mendelsohn, Steven B.; Schwanke, Todd D.; Smith, Roger O.; RESNA 27th International Annual Conference 2004: Technology & Disability: Research, Design, Practice, & Policy,
Publication Date: 2004

Paper discusses the goals of the Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement (ATOMS) Project, which was developed to create techniques and standards for the measurement and definition of AT outcomes. The authors discuss six main points: (1) instances in which outcomes data could be legally binding in service decisions, (2) issues relating to the type of information that can be collected, and how the information can be applied, (3) the relevance of research techniques in AT services, (4) the framework of private organizations with legally relevant roles in AT outcomes evaluation, (5) the relationship between traditional measures of validity in educational, rehabilitative, and medical settings and (6) the types of data the study of AT outcomes can produce. The ATOMS Project is supported in part by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
Published by: Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA)   (Website:http://www.resna.org)

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.