Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Rigid Link-Segment Models as Predictors of Semi-Reclined Leg Cycling Kinematics

By Trumbower, Randy D., MS, PT; Faghri, Pouran D., MS, MD; Rajasekaran, Sanguthevar, PhD; RESNA 27th International Annual Conference 2004: Technology & Disability: Research, Design, Practice, & Policy,
Publication Date: 2004

Study conducted to compare the accuracies of four-bar and five-bar link segment models used to predict semi-reclined leg cycling kinematics in people who have spinal cord injuries and who are able-bodied. Data were collected from a participant with a spinal cord injury and from a participant who was able-bodied. Joint kinematic data of participants’ hips, knees, and ankles were evaluated and compared between the experimental and the two types of models during pedaling on a standard ERGYS exercise bike. A video-based motion capture system from Peak Performance Technologies was used for motion evaluation. The accuracies of the four-bar and the five-bar models were obtained using root-mean-square statistical analyses. The authors concluded that both models tended to oversimplify lower limb kinematics. The five-bar model was viewed as a more valid tool in determining the kinematics of cycling for both participants.

Assistive Products Discussed: REGYS CLINIC REHABILITATION SYSTEM
ERGYS 1 HOME REHABILITATION SYSTEM
Published by: Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA)   (Website:http://www.resna.org)

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.