Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Wheelchair Propulsion by Foot: Assessment Considerations

By Buck, Sheila, BSc, OT, ATP; Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 68-71
Publication Date: Fall 2004

Article discusses the assessment process involved in the use of the feet to assist with wheelchair propulsion among people who have had a stroke with resulting hemiparesis. Three main assessment considerations are detailed: (1) physical considerations, (2) functional considerations, and (3) environmental considerations. In order to achieve wheelchair foot propulsion, the individual must follow a gait pattern that involves a heel strike, mid stance, and toe off sequence. The physical considerations to consider in the assessment process include seat height to allow for the new gait pattern, seat depth to allow for knee flexion, a stable base of back and seat support, and a high friction surface for the seat and shoe. The functional considerations include standing transfers, full-length armrests, comfortable back cane height, attendant care, psychosocial factors, and motivation. Environmental considerations are listed as ground clearance, caster size, table height for activities, and the layout of the environment.
Published by: Thomas Land Publishers, Inc.   (Website:http://www.thomasland.com)

National Stroke Association    (Web Site: http://www.stroke.org )
This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number J49052

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.