Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Economic Assessment of Pressure Sore Prevention Using a Computerized Mattress System in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

By Catz, Amiram; Zifroni, Avi; Philo, Ora; Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 27, No. 21, pp. 1315-1319
Publication Date: 2005

Study conducted to assess the economic profitability of the Matrix 200, which is a computerized mattress system designed for people with spinal cord injuries who are at risk for pressure ulcers. The mattress is divided into 216 independent air chambers, as air is pumped into or out of the chamber to adjust the pressure to the minimum desired level. Clinicians can use a keyboard and a screen positioned at bedside to monitor and control levels of pressure. Cost benefit analysis was performed in order to evaluate the cost per day of this system and the cost per day of a standard foam mattress, which is divided by the cost of the labor required to create each mattress. The evaluation indicated that the cost feasibility of the Matrix 200 is advisable for clinicians and rehabilitation facilities to utilize when treating clients with spinal cord injuries who are at risk for pressure ulcers.
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Limited   (Website:http://taylorandfrancis.org)

International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine    (Web Site: http://www.isprm.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.