Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Reading Rate and Comprehension as a Function of Computerized Versus Traditional Presentation Mode: A Preliminary Study

By Sorrell, Christy; Bell, Sherry Mee; McCallum, R. Steve; Journal of Special Education Technology, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-12
Publication Date: 2007

Study conducted to compare outcomes in computerized versus traditional reading interventions on reading rate and comprehension of 12 elementary school-aged children. The participants were asked to read under two conditions: (1) independent, silent reading, and (2) computer-assisted reading with Kurzweil 3000. The program converts text to speech, as this taps into students’ visual and auditory senses. Surprisingly, the Kurzweil intervention did not prove to be more effective than traditional reading instruction for students who were identified as weak readers by their teachers in terms of reading rate and comprehension. A trend was noted for children who were identified as slow readers to increase their speed, though the opposite result was found for faster readers. Overall, these results indicate that for these participants, computer-assisted reading did not improve their comprehension. Implications for future research are discussed.

Assistive Products Discussed: KURZWEIL 3000 FOR MACINTOSH
KURZWEIL 3000 FOR WINDOWS
Published by: Exceptional Innovations   (Website:http://www.exinn.net)

Technology and Media Division (TAM) of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC)    (Web Site: http://www.tamcec.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.