Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Dynamic Biomechanical Model for Assessing and Monitoring Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Therapy

By Abdullah, Hussein A., PhD, PEng; Tarry, Cole, BSc; Datta, Rahul, BSc; Mittal, Gauri S., PhD, PEng; Abderrahim, Mohamed, PhD; Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 43-62
Publication Date: 2007

Article describes a dynamic biomechanical model that assesses and monitors trajectory, position, orientation, force, and torque generated by upper-limb (UL) movement during robot-assisted therapy. The model consists of 2 links that represent the upper arm and forearm, with 5 degrees of freedom (DOF) for the shoulder and elbow joints. The individualized inertial segment parameters and masses were based on anthropometric data. Real-time fused biofeedback of a 6-DOF force sensor and three-dimensional (3-D) pose sensors supported the model validations and application. The force sensor was mounted between the robot manipulator and the subject’s wrist, while the 3-D pose sensors were fixed at specific positions on the subject’s UL segments. Twenty non-disabled subjects were assigned 3 different therapy exercises to test and validate the model. Results showed that when the biomechanical model is taught an exercise, it can accurately predict a subject’s actual UL joint angles and torques and confirm that the exercise is isolating the desired movement. The model could be a useful tool for enhancing the functionality of post-stroke robot-assisted UL therapy.
Published by:

VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service    (Web Site: http://www.rehab.research.va.gov )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.