Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Effects of Prosthetic Foot Forefoot Flexibility on Oxygen Cost and Subjective Preference Rankings of Unilateral Transtibial Prosthesis Users

By Klodd, Elizabeth; Hansen, Andrew; Fatone, Stefania; Edwards, Mark; Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 543-552
Publication Date: 2010

Study assessed the effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on oxygen cost and subjective preference rankings of 13 unilateral transtibial prosthesis users. Participants had an average age of 53 years, their average height was 170 centimeters, and their average mass was 85 kilograms. Five experimental feet were fabricated for use in the study, of which F1 was the most flexible, F5 was the least flexible, and F3 was designed to conform to a biomimetic ankle-foot rollover shape. The feet were modeled after the Shape&Roll prosthetic foot but had different numbers of saw cuts within the forefoot members, allowing more or less flexibility during walking. Participants walked at the same comfortable, freely selected speed on the treadmill for 7 minutes with each foot while energy expenditure was measured. No significant difference was found in oxygen cost between the different feet. The order of use was also not significant. However, the preference ranking was significantly affected by the flexibility of the feet, with the most flexible foot, F1, ranking significantly poorer than F3 and F4. Results suggest that users may prefer prosthetic feet that match the flexibility of an intact ankle-foot system, even though no energetic benefit was detected at freely selected speeds. Implications for future research are discussed.
Published by:

VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service    (Web Site: http://www.rehab.research.va.gov )
Link to text: http://www.rehab.research.va.gov/jour/10/476/klodd.html

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.