Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

A.T. Literature- FES

  1. A Model for Simulating Dynamic Control of Seated Trunk Posture Using Functional Electrical Stimulation
  2. A Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Augmentative Treatment of Upper Limbs in Persons With Tetraplegia
  3. A Multi-Pad Electrode Based Functional Electrical Stimulation System for Restoration of Grasp
  4. A Randomized Trial to Investigate the Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation and Therapeutic Exercise on Walking Performance for People With Multiple Sclerosis
  5. An Apparatus for Characterization and Control of Isolated Muscle
  6. An Objective Method for Selecting Command Sources for Myoelectrically Triggered Lower-Limb Prostheses
  7. Automatic Identification of Gait Events Using an Instrumented Sock
  8. Automating Activity-Based Interventions: The Role of Robotics
  9. Back on My Feet
  10. BCI Controlled Walking Simulator for a BCI Driven FES Device
  11. Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System for Ankle Movement
  12. Cardiorespiratory Responses During Arm Ergometry, Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling, and Two Hybrid Exercise Conditions
  13. Comparing Joint Kinematics and Center of Mass Acceleration as Feedback for Control of Standing Balance by Functional Muscular Stimulation
  14. Comparison of Energy Costs of Leg-Cycling Wheelchairs With or Without Functional Electrical Stimulation and Manual Wheelchairs for Patients After Stroke
  15. Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Upper Extremity Hemiplegia: An Early-Phase Randomized Clinical Trial in Subacute Stroke Patients
  16. Control of Triceps Surae Stimulation Based on Shank Orientation Using a Uniaxial Gyroscope During Gait
  17. Decreased Central Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Patients After 8 Weeks of Surface Functional Electrical Stimulation
  18. Design and Validation of Low-Cost Assistive Glove for Hand Assessment and Therapy During Activity of Daily Living-Focused Robotic Stroke Therapy
  19. Development of a Hybrid Gait Orthosis: A Case Report
  20. Development of Hybrid Orthosis for Standing, Walking, and Stair Climbing After Spinal Cord Injury
  21. Does Functional Electrical Stimulation for Foot Drop Strengthen Corticospinal Connections?
  22. Effect of Peroneal Electrical Stimulation Versus an Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Obstacle Avoidance Ability in People With Stroke-Related Foot Drop
  23. Effect of Sensory-Amplitude Electric Stimulation on Motor Recovery and Gait Kinematics After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study
  24. Effects of a Foot Drop Neuroprosthesis on Functional Abilities, Social Participation, and Gait Velocity
  25. Effects of a New Radio Frequency-Controlled Neuroprosthesis on Gait Symmetry and Rhythmicity in Patients With Chronic Hemiparesis
  26. Effects of a Simple Functional Electric System and/or a Hinged Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Walking in Persons With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
  27. Energy Cost of the Case Western Reserve Standing Neuroprosthesis
  28. Evaluation and Optimization of FES Techniques for Exercise
  29. Exploratory Study of Perceived Quality of Life With Implanted Standing Neuroprostheses
  30. Feasibility of Combining Gait Robot and Multichannel Functional Electrical Stimulation With Intramuscular Electrodes
  31. Functional Electrical Stimulation of Spinal Cord Injury Patients
  32. Functional Electrical Stimulation Reinforced Tenodesis Effect Controlled by Myoelectric Activity From Wrist Extensors
  33. Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Grasping in Spinal Cord Injury: An Overview
  34. Functional Priorities, Assistive Technology, and Brain-Computer Interfaces After Spinal Cord Injury
  35. Functional Stimulation
  36. Gait Quality Is Improved by Locomotor Training in Individuals With SCI Regardless of Training Approach
  37. Getting Up Goals
  38. Healing Hands
  39. Helping the Paralyzed to Walk Again
  40. Home-Based Functional Electrical Stimulation Rescues Permanently Denervated Muscles in Paraplegic Patients With Complete Lower Motor Neuron Lesion
  41. Impact on Activities of Daily Living Using a Functional Electrical Stimulation Device to Improve Dropped Foot in People With Multiple Sclerosis, Measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
  42. Improved Ankle and Knee Control With a Dual-Channel Functional Electrical Stimulation System in Chronic Hemiplegia: A Case Report
  43. Improving Hand Function in Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study of Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation in Chronic Hemiplegia
  44. Increased Physical Fitness After 4-Week Training on a New Hybrid FES-Cycle in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
  45. Interaction of Poststroke Voluntary Effort and Functional Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
  46. Is Transcutaneous Peroneal Stimulation Beneficial to Patients With Chronic Stroke Using an Ankle-Foot Orthosis? A Within-Subjects Study of Patients’ Satisfaction, Walking Speed and Physical Activity Level
  47. L300 Plus Thigh Cuff Improves Control Over Knee Flexion
  48. Leading by Example
  49. Long-Term Therapeutic and Orthotic Effects of a Foot Drop Stimulator on Walking Performance in Progressive and Nonprogressive Neurological Disorders
  50. Making Things Possible
  51. Mechanical Arm Trainer for the Treatment of the Severely Affected Arm After a Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers
  52. Model Based Feedback Control for FES Cycling
  53. Muscle Plasticity and Ankle Control After Repetitive Use of a Functional Electrical Stimulation Device for Foot Drop in Cerebral Palsy
  54. Musculoskeletal Model of Trunk and Hips for Development of Seated-Posture-Control Neuroprosthesis
  55. New in Neurotech
  56. New Technology Heralds Hope
  57. Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke
  58. Outcomes in Upright Mobility in Individuals With a Spinal Cord Injury
  59. Paralyzed Man Regains Voluntary Leg Movement With Electrode Array Implant
  60. Paretic Upper Extremity Movement Gains Are Retained 3 Months After Training With an Electrical Stimulation Neuroprosthesis
  61. Persons With C5 or C6 Tetraplegia Achieve Selected Functional Gains Using Neuroprosthesis
  62. Physiologic Responses to Electrically Assisted and Frame-Supported Standing in Persons with Paraplegia
  63. Selection of Optimal Muscle Set for 16-Channel Standing Neuroprosthesis
  64. Sensor Based Stance Control With Orthosis and Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation for Walking After Spinal Cord Injury
  65. Stimulating Modalities
  66. Stroke Rehabilitation Evolves
  67. Surface Electrical Stimulation of Trunk Musculature During Wheelchair Propulsion
  68. The Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Balance Function and Balance Confidence in Community-Dwelling Individuals With Stroke
  69. Therapy Following Spinal Cord Injury
  70. Three-Year Follow-Up of an Implanted Functional Electrical Stimulation System for Upright Mobility in a Child with a Thoracic Level Spinal Cord Injury
  71. Upper-Extremity Functional Electric Stimulation-Assisted Exercises on a Workstation in the Subacute Phase of Stroke Recovery
  72. Use of the Case Western Reserve/Veterans Administration Neuroprosthesis for Exercise, Standing and Transfers by a Paraplegic Subject
  73. WalkAccess: Home Assessment Program for People With Foot Drop
  74. Wireless Device Hailed as New Modality for Foot Drop, But Can Patients Afford it?
  75. Wireless Wearable Controller for Upper-Limb Neuroprosthesis
  • Home
  • Alternate Layout
  • My AbleData
  • Contact
  • Site Map
  • A-Z Index
  • Help
  • Privacy

    • AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
    Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
    by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

    The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.