Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Enhancing Literacy Development Through AAC Technologies

By Sturm, Janet M.; Erickson, Karen; Yoder, David E.; Assistive Technology, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 71-80
Publication Date: Summer 2002

Article discusses factors influencing literacy among students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), including reading and writing capabilities of students who use AAC, instruction in general education classrooms, and technology to support literacy instruction and learning. For example, a number of software tools are available that are designed to complement literacy learning. Such tools focus on skills such as spelling, word recognition, and vocabulary acquisition, all of which can be practiced via drills, tutorials, and interactive games. The authors contend that literacy learning should be a primary concern among AAC technology developers to provide access to education for students who use AAC. Priorities for future research and technology developments are discussed.
Published by: Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA)   (Website:http://www.resna.org)

This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number J48249

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.