Skip navigation Return to standard layout with columns
Menu

Relationship Between Self-Reported Upper Limb Disability and Quantitative Tests in Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome

By Poole, Kerry; Mason, Howard; Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 359-366
Publication Date: March 2007

Study conducted to establish the relationship between quantitative tests of hand function and upper limb disability as measured by the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire among people with hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). A total of 228 people with HAVS participated in the study. Each participant had undergone a full HAVS assessment prior to the study, which included quantitative tests of vibrotactile and thermal perception thresholds, maximal hand-grip strength, and the Purdue pegboard test. A DASH questionnaire was also completed in the study. The Purdue pegboard test and the hand-grip strength test were found to provide the most statistically significant individual correlations with the DASH disability score. The authors conclude that measurements of manual dexterity and hand-grip strength via the Purdue pegboard and the hand-grip strength can be useful in helping to confirm deficits in upper limb function and perceived disability among people with HAVS.
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Limited   (Website:http://taylorandfrancis.org)

International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine    (Web Site: http://www.isprm.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.